CYBERSQUATTING LAWS IN INDIA

CYBERSQUATTING LAWS IN INDIA

What is Domain Name?

Domain name is an address of a website that is intended to help web users easily finds a person or business or organization, online. Almost all businesses today have a domain name registered and involve in promoting the same amongst its customers. Domain names often end up becoming a brand in itself and must be trademarked to prevent misuse.

What is Cybersquatting?

The term Cybersquatting refers to the unauthorized registration and use of Internet domain names that are identical or similar to trademarks, service marks, company names, or personal names.

Cybersquatting is an offence related to the registration of a domain name by an entity that does not have an inherent right or identical trademark registration in its favour, with the sole intention to sell them to the legitimate user in order to earn illegal profits. Hence, Cybersquatting has become one of the problems faced by many online businesses with popular domain names.

Cases involving Cybersquatting in India:

One of the options available against cybersquatters in India is litigation in a court of law. The court in India has also issued various injunction restraining cybersquatters from misusing domain names.

In the case of Rediff, the Bombay High Court granted an injunction restraining the defendant from using the domain name “RADIFF” or any other similar name, as it was held that when both domain names are considered, there is every possibility of internet users being confused and deceived into believing that both domain names belong to one common source and connection. Also in the case of Naukri.com, “Naukari.com” was held to be confusingly similar to that of the plaintiff, “naukri.com”, with a different spelling variant establishing prima facie inference of bad faith.

Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, a domain name regulatory authority has adopted a Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) for dealing with cybersquatting. UDRP is incorporated into the domain registration agreement and sets the terms and conditions in connection with a dispute between the registrant and any party other than the registrar over the registration and use of an Internet domain name. The UDRP has guidelines for resolving cybersquatting and while registering a domain name, the registrant agrees to submit to proceedings commenced under Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.

.IN Dispute Resolution Policy (INDRP)

The .in top-level domain is operated under the authority of National Internet Exchange of India or NIXI. Hence, domain name or cybersquatting disputes pertaining to .in domains are handled by the .IN Dispute Resolution Policy and the INDRP Rules of Procedure. As per INDRP, any Person who considers that a registered domain name conflicts with his legitimate rights or interests may file a complaint to the .IN Registry on the following premises:

  1. the Registrant’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name, trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
  2. the Registrant has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
  3. the Registrant’s domain name has been registered or is being used in bad faith.

CONCLUSION:

Cybersquatting has become a lucrative online practice that may negatively affect the reputation of well-established commercial brands. The owners of such brands may face legal challenges related to overcoming their cybersquatting issues. Although domain name disputes related to cybersquatting and related practices can be resolved in a timely and affordable manner through UDRP and INDRP procedures, preventive measures can save trademarks owners the fees for initiating such procedures.

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views / position of RKS Associate, but remains a probable view. For any further queries or follow up please contact RKS Associate at [email protected]

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x