Introduction:
Related Party Transactions (RPTs) are transactions between a company and its related entities, such as subsidiaries, associates, key managerial personnel, or promoters. While RPTs are often necessary for business operations, they pose risks of conflicts of interest, financial misstatements, and corporate governance failures. Hence, legal frameworks and compliance mechanisms are essential to regulate these transactions.
Legal Framework Governing RPTs in India
Several laws and regulations govern Related Party Transactions in India to ensure transparency and accountability.
- Companies Act, 2013:
- The Companies Act, 2013, under Sections 188 and 177, regulates RPTs for companies. Definition of Related Party: Section 2(76) defines related parties, including directors, key managerial personnel, relatives, and entities under common control.
- Approval Requirements:
- Board approval is required for all RPTs.
- Shareholder approval (by special resolution) is mandatory for transactions exceeding prescribed limits.
- Audit Committee approval is required for listed and certain other specified companies.
- Disclosure Obligations: Companies must disclose RPTs in board reports and financial statements.
- SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015:
For listed companies, the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 impose stricter compliance norms.
- Audit Committee Approval: All RPTs must be pre-approved by the audit committee.
- Material RPTs: Transactions exceeding 10% of annual turnover require shareholder approval, with related parties abstaining from voting.
- Enhanced Disclosures: Companies must disclose RPTs in annual reports, stock exchange filings, and financial statements.
- Accounting Standards and Ind AS:
- Accounting Standard (AS) 18 and Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 24 mandate disclosure of RPTs in financial statements, covering nature, terms, and balances of transactions.
- Objective: Ensures transparency and prevents financial misstatements.
Challenges:
Despite a strong legal framework, several compliance challenges persist in ensuring fair RPTs. Identifying related parties can be complex due to intricate corporate structures and indirect relationships. Frequent changes in shareholding and management further complicate this process. Conflict of interest and governance issues arise, particularly in promoter-driven companies, where RPTs may prioritize promoter interests over those of minority shareholders. A lack of independent oversight and undue influence from vested interests can undermine fair decision-making.
Non-compliance with disclosure norms remains a major challenge, with some companies providing inadequate or misleading disclosures, which erodes transparency and investor confidence. Failure to disclose related party relationships in financial reports can lead to regulatory penalties. Transfer pricing risks also pose significant concerns, as determining arm’s length pricing is difficult, particularly for intangible assets and intercompany services. This complexity can lead to regulatory scrutiny, tax disputes, and penalties, especially for multinational enterprises operating in India.
Enforcement and penalty mechanisms face issues, with delays in regulatory investigations and limited enforcement reducing deterrence. Penalties under the Companies Act and SEBI regulations may not always be sufficient to prevent malpractices. Additionally, regulatory bodies may lack sufficient resources to take timely action against non-compliance. The influence of promoters and majority shareholders can further complicate compliance, as they may exert undue control over transaction approvals, sidelining the interests of minority shareholders. Proxy advisory firms and institutional investors may not always have enough power to challenge unfair RPTs, and shareholder activism in this regard is still evolving.
Operational challenges for companies include managing compliance with multiple regulatory frameworks, such as SEBI, the Companies Act, and tax laws. Maintaining detailed documentation and justifying transactions can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Internal control mechanisms may also be insufficient in companies with large and diverse related party networks, making it difficult to monitor and regulate all transactions effectively.
Conclusion:
Related Party Transactions are an integral part of business operations but require strict regulatory compliance to prevent misuse. The Companies Act, SEBI regulations, tax laws, and accounting standards together form a comprehensive legal framework. However, challenges remain in ensuring fair transactions and preventing conflicts of interest. Strengthening corporate governance, improving transparency, and adopting best practices can help companies navigate compliance complexities and build investor confidence.
Subscribe
0 Comments
Oldest