The insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016 (IBC) is the bankruptcy law of India which seeks to consolidate the existing framework by creating a single law for insolvency and bankruptcy. The insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2015 was introduced in Lok Sabha in December 2015. It was passed by Lok Sabha on 5th May, 2016 and by Rajya Sabha on 11th May, 2016. The code received the assent of the President of India on 28th May, 2016.
The bankruptcy code is a one stop solution for resolving insolvencies which previously was a long process that did not offer an economically viable arrangement. The code aims to protect the interests of small investors and make the process of doing business less cumbersome. Applicability and a brief description about the insolvency resolution process for corporate entities.
The IBC applies to the following:
An insolvency resolution process under the IBC can be initiated by any creditor in the event there is a minimum default of INR 1,00,00,000 (Rupees One Crores only) of such creditor’s debt by the debtor. Such an application can be filed by an operational creditor or a financial creditor before the National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”) of the relevant jurisdiction. The NCLT will consider the following elements before admitting such an application:
An appeal from any order or judgment of the NCLT, within the time specified therein, will lie with the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”). Further, appeals from the NCLAT will lie with the Supreme Court.
A creditor, for the purposes of the IBC may be an operational creditor or a financial creditor. A debtor is any entity or an individual who owes any liability or obligation in respect of a claim which is due from any person and includes a financial debt and operational debt. If the debtor is either a company or an LLP, then such a debtor is referred to as a corporate debtor.
Default is defined as non-payment of debt when whole or any part or installment of the amount of debt has become due and payable but has not been repaid by the debtor.
The IBC provides for 2 (two) main categories of creditors i.e.
Financial creditor; and Operation creditors.
Financial creditors may either be secured creditors or unsecured creditors. The main difference between secured and unsecured financial creditors is that in the event of liquidation and asset distribution proceedings, secured creditors are given a higher priority than unsecured creditors. Further, during the liquidation process, secured financial creditors are given the same priority of repayment as workmen and employee dues and are given a higher priority that other operational creditors, who are treated as unsecured creditors for the purposes of liquidation.
When compared to operational creditors, the procedure for financial creditors to initiate insolvency proceedings is a lot easier. The IBC allows financial creditors to make an application to the NCLT directly and such financial creditors will only need to show that there is a default. It is also important to note that only financial creditors constitute the committee of creditors, and no operational creditor can be part of this committee.
Operational debt has been defined in the IBC as a claim in respect of the provision of goods or services, including employment or debt in respect of the repayment of dues arising under any law for time being in force and payable to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority.
The Supreme court, in the case of Mobilix Innovations Pvt. Ltd v. Kirusa Software Private Limited held that while determining if a dispute exists with the debtor with regards to the payment of any debt, the NCLT will be required to see only if there is a dispute and that the NCLT may not go into the merits of such dispute.
During this process, the financial creditors investigate the corporate debtor to determine whether it is viable to continue its business. The creditors also come up with a plan to restructure the corporate debtor. The various steps involved in a CIRP are:
The IBC has taken its first steps to regularize the insolvency process in India. However legislation has been ridden with controversies and speedy resolutions. It has also become a very important tool for banks to regularize multitudes of non-performing assets.
The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views / position of RKS Associate, but remains a probable view. For any further queries or follow up please contact RKS Associate at [email protected]